|
An LCD monitor is a real asset in digital photography because it provides a helpful check on all of the elements in an image, both technical and aesthetic. |
This isn’t simply an opinion. I’ve seen it to be true from what I’ve observed of participants in workshops around the country and the world, from talking with many top pros, and from watching my own work evolve over the last few years. I’m not talking about image quality, color, noise or lack of noise, or any technical aspects of a digital image. I’m talking about the aesthetic of a photograph.
Capturing exciting and beautiful landscapes challenges photographers. Their experience with that landscape is so overwhelming that the temptation is simply to point the camera, press the shutter and think a landscape photograph is made. Yet what often happens is that one gets an attractive snapshot of that scene, but not necessarily a better photograph.
I often bring up Andreas Feininger, the LIFE photographer who wrote popular books about photography during the 1960s and ’70s. That’s the period when I was growing up as a photographer, and I was influenced by his ideas. His books are no longer in print, but you can find them in used bookstores and over the Internet.
Feininger talked a lot about the difference between a photograph and a snapshot. A snapshot comes from simply pointing a camera at a subject. A photograph comes from using the craft of photography to create a unique image that says something special about the way you saw and interacted with that subject. That means using such aspects of photography as recognizing good light, choosing focal length for perspective and finding a unique composition. A photograph is something that stands on its own as an interesting visual interpretation of a scene, but isn’t simply a record of that scene. You can spend a lot of time studying photography, including reading every page of OP to get ideas for your photography. But you have to get outside and photograph if you’re going to implement those ideas. The challenge of film always used to be translating what you saw in the world into a photograph. You had no way of being certain that what you captured on film would be satisfying as a photograph until the film returned from processing.
Page 1 of 2
1 Comment
FeedAdd Comment
Popular OP Articles
|
Get 11 Issues of Outdoor Photographer for only $14.97! That's 77% off the cover price!
OP Most Popular Tags
- How-To
- Lenses
- Locations
- Portfolio
- Cameras
- Compact Cameras
- D-SLRs
- Light and Motion
- Photo Software
- Software
- Gear
- In Focus
- New Products
- Camera Technique
- Panoramas
- Lightroom
- Digital Horizons
- On Landscape
- Column
- Photo Traveler
- Photo Adventure
- More Gear
- Gadget Bag
- Favorite Places
- Tripods & Support
- Buyer's Guide
- Filters & Plug-Ins
- Environment
- Books
- Tech Tips
- Sharing & Websites
- Basic Jones
- Printing & Processing
- Computers & Periphals
- Digital Darkroom
- Video
- World View




Columns






John U makes this comment
Saturday, 16 August 2008