|
 |
|
|
| |
 |
HOW–TO |
 |
Digital Horizons: The Magic Of (Custom) White Balance
Auto white balance is a useful tool, but can be limiting if it’s the only white balance you use
By Rob SheppardM |
|
| |
| |
With the popularity
of digital cameras exploding, many photographers now know about
white balance, yet this isn’t new technology. It began
with video cameras nearly 50 years ago, when color television
became common.
This same idea was adapted to digital cameras and is a tremendous
help. With film, matching colors to a scene often required extensive
filtration, and even then, you couldn’t be sure. With digital,
you can count on colors being accurate, especially since you
can see them right away as you shoot. While the LCD monitor
won’t give completely accurate colors, it will give you
enough of an idea of what’s in the image file that you
can judge if your white balance is doing the job.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
It’s interesting to note
that at all major sporting events covered by the networks, they
use their big video trucks with hundreds of thousands of dollars
of technology, while the network camera people still use manual
white balance; it’s called “painting” or “shading”
in the business. Do they know something we don’t? Why not
just use auto white balance? After all, auto white balance uses
complex algorithms and internal camera processors to examine
a scene and try to match the manual adjustment of white balance.
Manufacturers have become very good at this, making auto white
balance a valid tool.
Still, many pros prefer selecting specific white balance settings
for several reasons:
1. Auto white balance can shift as
a lens is zoomed or the composition changed across a scene. This can make matching images more difficult when working with
them later; this wasn’t a problem with film, as film had
one and only one “white balance” matched to a specific
color of light.
2. Having a specific white balance
makes colors more predictable. This is just like shooting
a specific film; you know what the colors will look like.
3. The range of color temperatures
balanced by a camera is generally greater manually than on automatic.
4. Scenes usually are completely
cleaned up from overall color cast problems (some color
casts, such as sunset colors, are supposed to be included).
5. Panoramas need consistent colors; auto white balance can change enough that time must be spent
balancing different frames in the computer.
6. RAW workflow is more efficient
because you chose a white balance specifically for the scene; each image from that scene will have a consistent color.
Although nearly all digital cameras, from small to large, have
a custom white-balance control that works like the videographer’s
white balancing on a white card, few photographers, amateur
or pro, know much about it, and fewer still actually use it.
It’s worth learning even if you don’t use it all the
time. It offers some control and color correction not possible
any other way. There are some reasons beyond old habits that
even video folks use it. Let me give you some examples.
While leading a photo tour to Peru last June, I learned one
of the participants was having trouble getting clean colors
from a unique area of salt evaporating pools. Everything kept
looking blue (this may have been from the altitude, although
her camera reacted more strongly than others). I showed her
how to use the camera’s custom white balance and instantly
the white salt looked white! The whole scene looked better in
her photos.
At Machu Picchu, we found ourselves in a rainstorm unusual for
that time of year. As it let up, everyone began photographing
again, but the gray conditions gave less than satisfactory color.
Several people tried custom white balancing and discovered they
could get much better color.
One area where auto white balance has given me problems is in
the shade. Shade colors are extremely varied, yet whenever I’ve
done comparisons from auto white balance to shade and cloudy
presets to custom settings, I’ve almost always preferred
the custom settings. Custom settings let your camera precisely
measure the color of the light and adjust the camera accordingly.
Auto white balance is somewhat of a compromise (although often
a good one) based on what engineers think a picture should look
like. It just doesn’t always give the best colors possible.
To me, custom white balance furthers the idea of “getting
the shot right” from the start and supports the craft of
photography. It also allows you to interact with the subject,
while you’re still with the subject, to be sure you get
the right colors.
Hard-core RAW users might say they always can match anything
done by the camera later in software. This isn’t exactly
right with custom settings (unless you photographed a white
object and kept that photo to use as a reference). Even if you’re
using RAW, the use of custom white balance often will result
in better colors because you’re actually measuring the
light’s effect on a white card rather than trying to figure
out what white balance should have been after the fact.
Finally, you can tweak colors in unique ways that can make your
work more personal and controllable. You can white balance on
a color, for example. If you white balance on a pale blue card,
say, the camera removes that blue and warms up the photo. You
can white balance on any color you want and the camera will
try to remove that color (it will vary in how well it does that
because the control wasn’t really designed for this!).
It’s funny to see the card become more “neutral”
if you take a picture of it (or see it in the live LCD of a
non-SLR digital camera). You can experiment by picking up a
bunch of paint sample cards from your local paint store.
Using custom white balance isn’t difficult. Put a white
(or gray) card in front of the camera, press the appropriate
button and the camera is matched to the scene. I wish I could
give more specifics, but unfortunately, this is one of those
areas where engineers seem to want to express their creativity.
Custom white-balance procedures should be consistent, but they
aren’t. Cameras vary considerably in how this setting is
achieved, even among the same brand.
First, you need to set up the custom white balance, then select
it among your white-balance settings for actual photography.
Setup is usually menu-based. You’ll need to check your
manual.
Place something white in front of your camera (it doesn’t
have to be in focus unless your camera won’t work otherwise).
Be sure it’s in the same light as your subject. For digital
cameras that have live LCDs (non-SLR), you usually go to the
white-balance setup control and move your camera until a marker
lines up with the white and press a button (which button depends
on the whim of the camera designer, it seems; sometimes it’s
marked on the LCD, sometimes you have to refer to the manual).
For digital SLRs, you have to take a picture of the white object.
The next steps are quite variable, but typically you play back
that photo and push some button or combination of buttons to
lock in a white balance based on it. (Doesn’t this seem
silly? There’s really no good reason why this couldn’t
be standardized.)
Once you’ve set the white balance, you need to be sure
you’ve chosen it among your white-balance selections.
Give it a try. Pick up some paint sample cards and try them,
too. Custom white balance is a great way to increase your control
over your image while you’re still in the field shooting.
Plus, it often will reduce the time you spend in front of the
computer later. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
MORE HOW–TOS |
|
|
|
|
By Subject
Look here for the techniques you need in order to photograph specific outdoor and nature photography subjects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Photoshop
Discover how you can best use Adobe Photoshop and other image-processing software to optimize and enhance your nature images
|
|
|
|
More How-Tos
Discover the wide range of nature photography techniques and how-to in this varied selection of articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
