jk wrote:The reason I was asking was because I want to get a longer lens. Landscape & wildlife and was trying to figure out some of the distances some of these shots were made. Yes, cropping is going to come into play and I didn't figure that in. I think I will look at the 70-300 Nikon lens - seems to have ok reviews and I want nice clear photos that can be cropped or trimmed to bring the subject in closer without them looking fuzzy or soft. Be patient with us Rookies!! Thank you for your input as always.
Jk
JK,
I rarely use the same lens for landscapes and wildlife. Usually for landscapes a wide angle lens is used and for wildlife, you'll need a telephoto. If you're including birds in your meaning of wildlife, you want the biggest telephoto lens you can find. A 300mm lens is rarely long enough for birds. I sometimes have to add a teleconverter to my 100-400 to capture shots of birds and have been known to stack teleconverters to increase the reach.
Another consideration will be whether or not you are planning on using a tripod. If not, VR will help reduce camera shake and give you better shots - especially in low light situations. I believe one of the Nikon 70-300 models does have VR. If you're planning on using a tripod, you might look at some of the 3rd party lenses. They are normally a little easier on the budget. One of the members here (Southern Wolf) uses a Sigma 50-500 with excellent results, but I've never seen him use it without a tripod. You might browse through the wildlife section for some of his posts to see his results.
JK, don't worry about being a "Rookie". This is a very friendly board and I don't think any member has a problem trying to answer questions. We've all been there at one time. Good luck with your search and if you have any other questions, fire away.
Bob R