What is YOUR camera?

This is the place to talk about the latest camera bodies and optics, what you use or don’t use, and to add your questions for fellow forum users to offer solutions.

Moderators: admin, tjo

Postby Robin » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:01 pm

Great work, Pro! What camera do you use the most? :D
Robin
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:30 am

Postby Professional » Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:21 am

Robin wrote:Great work, Pro! What camera do you use the most? :D


Thank you very much :D

For Studio: 1Ds MKII [5D is backup]
For outdoor landscapes and urban: 5D [1Ds MKII is backup]
For Sports or actions: 1D MKIIN

30D and 350D are backups, rarely used.
Professional
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:55 am
Location: Ajman - United Arab Emirates

Postby Walczak Photo » Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:47 pm

CG415 wrote:Jim,

I'm looking at adding the 70 - 300 Tamron to my equipment. I wanted to know do you like that lens? And I have heard that the front lens rotates when you zoom in and out is that true?

Thanks,

Chris


Hey CG, sorry I didn't get back to your question until now...

Yes, I have to say that all things considered, I really do love my Tamron 70-300. For the money it truly is an outstanding lens and I use it more than any of my other lenses combined. Yes, it focuses a little slow, especially in low light and yes, the focus is a little noisy...in other words, no it doesn't focus like a $1000 Canon or Nikon lens, but for the $90 I paid for this lens the quality and sharpness of the optics are unbeatable! The sharpness of the shots I get from this lens EASILY compares with that of the Canon 70-300mm...and even new, this lens is less than half the price ($179 for the Tamron vs. $549 for the Canon based on todays price at Adorama.com) although granted, it's not an IS like the Canon is.

As to the front lens rotating when you're zooming...no...it does not (I just ran downstairs and checked). It does however rotate when you're focusing...as virtually any lens in this price range would. Yes it can be a little annoying when you are using a polarizer (or something like a split color filter), and at the very least, a little more time consuming as you have to stop and re-adjust things occastionally, but that's really the only downside to it. Again though, virtually any lens in this price range is going to do that...ya learn to live with it.

Now having shot with this lens for almost a year now, I will say that I do wish it was a faster lens...that f/4-5.6 makes it really hard to use indoors without a flash and even in shade without having to bump up the ISO...an f/2.8 would be ideal. I also wish it had IS (image stabilization) considering I do much of my shooting handheld. Yes, I do wish it had a faster focusing mechanism...a faster focus would be nice for those animals I shoot that never stop moving around in their habitats. I was recently shooting a little gray fox at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History who wouldn't stop moving and with the camera's focus in "servo mode", the lens was still struggling to keep up with this little guy. A faster focus would have allowed me to walk away with more keepers (probably). Slow focusing seems to be one of the biggest pitfalls of all Tamron lenses. But again here we're talking about an "entry level" lens and not a $1000-$4000 "pro" lens here. -If- this 70-300 were an f.2.8 with IS and a really fast focus, I have no doubt that it would be at least $1000 if not considerably more...even being a Tamron. With that said though, I don't think the lens would be any sharper at all...just more convenient. As with so many things in regards to photography, this is about compromise...if you don't have $1000+ and you can live with a slower focusing lens, again these Tamrons are -sharp-...and to me, that's THE most important thing.

Honestly, most of the gripes I've seen about Tamron lenses have been from people who were expecting to get something comparable to a $1500 Canon "L" lens (or something comparable in a Nikkor) for only $200 and then were disappointed because the lens has a plastic barrel instead of metal and because the focus was slow...it's amazing how naive, petty and downright stupid people can be sometimes. People want to "have their cake and eat it too" but don't want to actually have to pay for it by the slice I guess! LOL! I have to add here that in some ways, I think those plastic bodies are actually more "rugged" than the metal bodies. Last summer I dropped my Tamron 70-300mm in the middle of a street intersection...it fell out of my coat pocket while shooting a water fountain and other than a chipped UV filter, the lens didn't suffer any damage at all. Had that of been a Canon L lens, I'm positive I would have ended up with a $1500 paper weight! LOL!!! I'd rather have a sharp...and working $90 lens than a $1500 paper weight any day!

As long as you understand these things, then YES, I whole-heartedly recommend Tamron lenses and I think you'd be really happy with the 70-300mm LD. In the sub-$500 price range, I think it's one of the very best lenses out there and certainly one of the sharpest even at several times the price!

Peace,
Jim
Walczak Photo
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:48 pm
Location: Northern Ohio

I have an Olypmus

Postby Mstee4eva » Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:38 pm

I have an Olympus SP510uz
I recently was given a brand new Olympus E510 for my Birthday it came with the 14-42 lens and 40-150 lens.
Do you see what I see???
Mstee4eva
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:04 am
Location: Raleigh, NC

New here

Postby jd tx » Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:16 am

Hi all..I am new and have an old Fuji 5100 that I take everywhere and a newer ..still tryin' to figure it all out Canon Rebel XT SLR..I only have the 2 lenses that came with the Canon a 75-300 zoom and the standard 18-55..I really enjoy getting close ups of things like flowers, insects, etc but am still working on clarity, "noise" ..a term I learned here..
Seems like a great place and I would like to post some pics here..I hope I don't HAVE to go to another site and download them and then come back here to post them..anyway I want to thank all of you for the great pics and tips I have seen here..
jd tx
 

Postby BlackDog's » Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:51 pm

Hello, new here too. Love the topic.

I have a few cameras (film and digital) but I probably use my Minolta Maxxum 7D the most with a KMinolta 28 - 75mm f/2.8 zoom, Minolta 100-300mm F/4.5-5.6 zoom or my newest addition a Lensbaby 3G.
BlackDog's
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Minnesota

Postby jayryser » Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:20 pm

New here as well!

Cameras - Sony a700 & a100
Lenses - All Sigmas - 300mm f/2.8, 100-300mm f/4, 24-70 f/2.8, 17-35 f/2.8-4
Giottos tripod
Workflow in Lightroom♦
"The mountains are calling and I must go." ~ John Muir
jayryser
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:08 am
Location: Lakewood, CO

Postby dculp » Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:35 am

With the help of others in the forum, topic Alaska Trip, I just upgraded to the Canon Xsi (came in about two weeks ago) and use the Canon 100 - 400 4.5 IS, Canon 2x Extender, Tamron 28 - 300 and the 18 -55 IS that came with the new camera.

Can't wait to put it all to the test in Alaska in July!
dculp
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:26 pm
Location: North Carolina

Postby Stan Z. » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:35 pm

For me- Canon Rebel XT, Canon 18-55; Tamron 18-200; Tamron 70-300

The Tamron 18-200 is great, but a little "heavy". I use a tripod with the 70-300.
Stan Z. in AZ
Stan Z.
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Green Valley, Arizona

Postby Terry B. » Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:55 am

Hi. I'm new here ...
Love to shoot landscapes for fun; used to do some wedding work using Mamiya 645 ,etc., but got burned out on it and then made the leap to digital . After my boot camp Lumix SLR-like camera, which did take some very nice pics, I jumped to a Canon XTi . I got caught up in wanting L lenses and managed to acquire , on limited budget, a 17-40 and a 70-200 . After realizing that my focal length coverage wasn't perfect , for the XTi, I went back to Tamron . I always thought they had a long of bang for the buck. I used to shoot a 90mm 2.5 Tammy in the old 35mm Film days and it was superb.
I just recently sold the 17-40L and replaced with Tammy 11-18 and 28-75 2.8. Kept the Canon 70-200 L , as its outstanding, even w/o IS.
So, I've become practical, forgot about trying to be in the "L" Club as much, and am setting my sights on just shooting great pics.
I'm also a guitar player and the same holds true, its a tool and in the right hands , can be heavenly. The brand of the tool does not the player make. :lol:
Love this forum and hope to learn a lot even after shooting semi-pro for some 26 yrs.
A sample of my Tamron work...looking forward to heading out West again!
Great to meet all of you!

Image
Terry B.
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:56 am
Location: Snellville, Ga.

Postby gldiana » Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:03 pm

You sold the 17-40 L ???? Noooooooo!!
That's a great lens, I hope they make an IS version soon or a f/2.8.

Jim too plays guitar (he's been quiet lately). You'll find yourself right at home here.
Luca
----
Check my website and blog for discounts on HDR Software Photomatix and NikSoftware titles
http://www.lucadiana.com/
http://www.lucadiana.net/blog
http://www.facebook.com/lucadianaphotography
gldiana
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:18 am
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming

Postby gunfighter48 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:58 pm

I have a Nikon D60, 18-55 VR, 55-200VR, and 70-300VR lenses. Just getting started again after a 14 year break from photography.
gunfighter48
A steady hand works well for cameras and guns!
gunfighter48
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:04 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Postby gldiana » Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:30 pm

Welcome back to photography, Gunfighter, and welcome to the forum.
Luca
----
Check my website and blog for discounts on HDR Software Photomatix and NikSoftware titles
http://www.lucadiana.com/
http://www.lucadiana.net/blog
http://www.facebook.com/lucadianaphotography
gldiana
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:18 am
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming

Re: What is YOUR camera?

Postby kgb » Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:49 pm

I suppose I might be considered a luddite, I use a

Mamiya 645 Pro Tl
45mm
55mm
80mm
80mm Macro
150mm

Also

EOS 3
Sigma 17-35
Sigma 28-70
Canon 70-200mm F4 L
Sigma 105mm Macro

I have various other cameras including a Nikon F70 and 50mm F1.8
kgb
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Sheffield, England

Re: What is YOUR camera?

Postby jqsphoto » Sun Aug 17, 2008 5:00 am

I have a couple I use regularly...
Canon 1d Mark III
Canon 5d
Canon 16-35mm f 2.8L USM
Canon 24-105mm f4 L IS USM
Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L IS USM. Jerry from Sarasota, Florida
jqsphoto
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:12 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cameras and Lenses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests

cron