OP Home > Gear > Cameras > Is Now The Time For Full-Frame D-SLRs?
  • Print
  • Email

Gear



Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Is Now The Time For Full-Frame D-SLRs?


With more options, state-of-the-art technology and lower prices, D-SLRs are worth a careful look for serious outdoor shooters

Labels: CamerasD-SLRs

This Article Features Photo Zoom

full frame
Nature photographers now can choose from among four “full-frame” D-SLRs, thanks to Nikon’s new D700 joining the D3 and Canon’s EOS-1Ds Mark III and EOS 5D.

With sensors the same size as a full 35mm image frame, full-frame D-SLRs provide the same angle of view as a 35mm SLR with any given lens. This is a big advantage for wide-angle fans, as it doesn’t require special extremely short-focal-length lenses to do wide-angle photography. Because smaller sensors “see” less of the image produced by any lens, cameras employing them require shorter focal lengths to produce a given angle of view (see Figure A, p. 66).

A related full-frame-sensor benefit is less diffraction. When you stop a lens down to increase depth of field, diffraction starts to affect image quality adversely. The smaller the lens opening, the greater the diffraction, and the worse the image quality. Because they produce a given angle of view with a longer lens, full-frame sensors yield less diffraction at any given ƒ-stop: A 24mm lens stopped down to ƒ/22 has an aperture diameter of 24/22 or 1.09mm. The 16mm lens needed to produce the same angle of view with an APS-C sensor has an aperture diameter of just 0.72mm at ƒ/22 (16/22). Of course, the shorter lens produces more depth of field than the longer one, so you don’t have to stop down as much to get the same depth of field. But the super-short focal lengths also tend to produce more distortion and vignetting.

Wide-angle photography isn’t the only advantage of full-frame sensors. You also get better image quality because larger sensors have room for more and/or larger pixels. More pixels mean finer detail, and you can blow up the images bigger. Larger pixels gather light more efficiently than smaller pixels, yielding a wider dynamic range and less noise at any given ISO setting. There are technological tricks camera manufacturers use to maximize image quality even from small pixels on small sensors, but all other things being equal, bigger pixels and more pixels are better.

Full-frame D-SLRs do have a few drawbacks. For one thing, they cost a lot more. Full-frame sensors are much more difficult to produce than smaller sensors, and they use a lot more material (an eight-inch silicon wafer might yield 200 APS-C sensors, but only 20 full-frame ones).

Another drawback is that wildlife photographers don’t get the “free focal-length boost” provided by smaller-sensor cameras. A 300mm telephoto lens on a full-frame D-SLR frames just as it does on a 35mm film SLR. On an APS-C D-SLR, the same 300mm lens frames as a 450mm lens does on a 35mm SLR. On a Four Thirds System D-SLR, a 300mm lens frames as a 600mm lens on a 35mm SLR. A smaller, lighter lens takes you a lot further with a smaller-sensor camera.

A final drawback of the full-frame sensor is that it tends to collect more dust than a smaller sensor, an especially critical factor when you’re frequently changing lenses in the field. Canon’s EOS-1Ds Mark III and Nikon’s D700 counter this by incorporating sensor-dust-removal systems.

We should point out that 35mm “full-frame” sensors aren’t the largest image sensors used in D-SLRs. The “medium-format” D-SLRs (those based on medium-format film cameras rather than 35mm SLRs) use sensors that are much bigger than “full-frame,” generally with a lot more pixels. As we write this, Hasselblad just announced the H3D II/50 medium-format D-SLR with a 49.1x36.8mm 50-megapixel Kodak CCD sensor that’s twice the size of a full-frame 35mm sensor. But that camera costs nearly $40,000—the 35mm-based models are far and away the most popular and the most affordable D-SLRs.

Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III
The current “king” of the 35mm-form-factor D-SLRs, at 21.1 megapixels, Canon’s EOS-1Ds Mark III is a do-it-all camera that can handle everything from epic landscapes to quick wildlife action. Dual parallel-processing DIGIC III image processors optimize image quality and operating speed (the camera can shoot those huge files at up to five per second, in bursts of up to 56 Large/Fine JPEGs or 12 RAW images), and reduce energy consumption (the Mark III can make up to 1,800 shots with a freshly charged battery—very handy when out in the field).

As a landscape camera, the Mark III provides 45% more pixels than any other 35mm-form-factor D-SLR (and 65% more than any other full-frame D-SLR). Its 14-bit A/D conversion can recognize 16,384 tonal or color gradations (vs. 4,096 for 12-bit conversion) for smoother, more detailed images.

The three-inch LCD monitor provides Live-View capability, which makes it easier to shoot low- and high-angle images. You even can send (using provided software) the live image to a laptop monitor and run the camera from there.

You’d expect a 21.1-megapixel full-frame D-SLR to be a great landscape camera, but the EOS-1Ds Mark III is a fine wildlife camera, too, featuring virtually the same AF system as the EOS-1D Mark III action camera. It’s true that you lose the “telephoto” factor of a small-sensor D-SLR when you use a full-frame D-SLR, but with the Mark III’s 21.1-megapixel images, you can crop in on the central portion of the image, increasing the effective focal length, and still have lots of megapixels. Also, the Mark III’s central AF point functions down to ƒ/8, so you can add a teleconverter to get back the “lost” focal length. One of our editors captured some excellent in-flight shots of various birds using our Mark III test camera with a 300mm ƒ/4 lens and a 2x teleconverter, a combination that won’t autofocus at all on the more compact EOS 40D.

Of course, as an EOS-1-series camera, the Mark III features Canon’s most rugged construction, with a magnesium-alloy chassis, external covers and mirror box, excellent dust- and weatherproofing, and a 300,000-cycle shutter. The EOS Integrated Cleaning System (including a grounded low-pass filter over the image sensor that vibrates ultrasonically each time you switch the camera on or off) helps keep the big sensor dust-free.

The Mark III can use all EF Canon lenses, but not EF-S lenses (which were designed specifically for the smaller-sensor cameras). This provides focal lengths from 14mm super-wide-angle and 15mm full-frame fish-eye to 800mm super-telephoto, including zooms from 16-35mm to 100-400mm, true 1:1 macro lenses and three manual-focus tilt-shift lenses.

full frame
full frame full frame
The EOS-1Ds Mark III is the top of Canon’s line and the current leader in the megapixel category with 21.1 total. The camera has an SD and CF memory card slot, which can be accessed on the rear LCD panel. As a state-of-the-art professional camera, every feature is quickly accessed and viewed on the LCD panel on top of the body.

Specifications
Image Sensor: 21.1-megapixel CMOS AF System: 45-point
ISO Settings: 100-1600, plus 50 and 3200
Continuous Firing Mode: 5 fps, 3 fps
Metering: 63-zone evaluative, 8.5% partial, 2.4% spot, center-weighted
Storage Media: CompactFlash (UDMA-compliant), SD/SDHC
Power Source: LP-E4 rechargeable lithium-ion battery
Dimensions: 6.1x6.3x3.1 inches
Weight: 42.5 ounces
Estimated Street Price: $7,999
Contact:
Canon USA, (800) OK-CANON, www.usa.canon.com

7 Comments

Feed
  1. Get the full frame dslr if you don't already have a small sensor dslr and if you already have 35mm lenses from film slrs.
  2. "Nature photographers now can choose from among four “full-frame” D-SLRs" Four? Is the Sony a900 not worth mentioning then because it's not a Canikon? The guy with the Minolta glass (Jim) might do well to look at that before spending $$$ on new lenses.
  3. Arguing if full-sensor DSLRs are superior to their ASP-C counterpart is a waste of time. If the basic facts regarding each format doesn't prove this, then it should be quite easy to demo each format at your local camera store and see the difference. We can also moan about the large investments we have in APS-C DLSRs. However, it should be no mystery that the technology we're buying today will be obsolete at some point.., that's how technology works. Personally, I'm very excited about the new full-sensor cameras. Even though I have several thousand invested in my Minolta 7D system, I'll be taking the plunge soon into the full-sensor DSLR world. Based on what I've read this far, this will most likely be done by purchasing a Nikon D3 to enhance my hobby of landscape photography.
  4. You say that the "D700 offers the [same (...) sensor and many (...) features] of [the D3] in a much smaller and lighter (...) package" and you refer to its "smaller size and lower weight", yet the "Weight" given in the "Specifications" boxes for *both* is listed as 43.2 ounces.
  5. I see that my 1st comment didn't make it so it was that the D3 and D700 have ISO settings of 200-6400 plus etc. not 200-1600 plus. Chris
  6. The D700 does not do 11 fps in DX mode like the D3. This is the 2nd correction I've given you. Please check your facts. Thanks, Chris
  7. I would love to see a comparison between the 5+ megapixel image obtained on a D3 or D700 using a DX lens versus the 12+ megapixel image obtained with that same DX lens using, say, a D80. Are the larger pixels of the full frame cameras able to compensate for the larger number of data points recorded with a 4/5 digital camera so that the actual image quality/resolution is the same or better? Many of us now have large investments in DX-type glass made for the 4/5 cameras.

Add Comment



Click to get a new image.
 

Popular OP Articles

Win This! Digital Photo Magazine Enewsletter
Banner