New Percentages

Today, “high ISO” means values like 25,600 instead of 800. These dramatic advancements are giving nature photographers a whole new way to think about making images.

Lion Cub With Bone: “I found these cubs late in the afternoon with the sun going down,” says Lepp, “and they were under a tree in the shade. The only possibility was to bring the ISO to 1600.” This is an excellent example of the kind of image that a natural-history photographer would be able to observe, but not photograph until recently. So many animals are much more active in the dark, and until now, we couldn’t get photographs of them in situations like these. Canon EOS-1D Mark IV, EF 100-400mm (275mm plus 1.3x), 1⁄60 sec., ƒ/5.6 and ISO 1600

George Lepp recently returned from an expedition to Africa, where he was using the Canon EOS 7D and EOS-1D Mark IV, and one of his traveling companions was using the Nikon D3 and D3S. These cameras are part of the wave of new DSLRs that are changing photography due to their ability to produce good images at ISO ratings we’d tend to think of as extreme. If you were a film shooter, you probably remember thinking of ASA 400 and 800 as “high-speed” emulsions. Using these films would get you highly grainy images with flat colors and a certain inherent loss of sharpness. Fast-forward to 2010: There are cameras that bump the ISO up to 102,400, and many of the current DSLRs can make excellent images with relatively little grain and plenty of color saturation at ISO ratings of 1600, 3200 and 6400. In fact, Lepp remarked that with some of these new cameras, he’s starting to think of 800 as the new ISO 100, 1600 as the new ISO 200 and 3200 as the new ISO 400.

It’s clear that the technology is advancing rapidly and photographers like Lepp are taking advantage of it to produce images that represent fundamental changes in photography. Says Lepp, “It has opened up possibilities we didn’t have before. I get much higher percentages of usable images, and I can do things I never thought of before.”

Little Bee-Eater: Describing how he got this image, Lepp says, “The attempt was to capture the little bee-eater in midair as it landed on a branch with a bug. Having 10 frames per second, ƒ/8 for a little depth of field and 1⁄6000 sec. made it happen. An ISO of 1600 was needed to get the desired numbers.” In the past, Lepp would have tried to time the bird’s flight to get this shot, and he would have had a lot of trial and error. How did Lepp capture the shot this time? “I set the ISO high to give me the depth of field and the action-stopping of a fast shutter speed. I prefocused and fired the series, and I got it! We planned it, and it worked.” Canon EOS-1D Mark IV, EF 500mm (500mm plus 1.3x), 1⁄6000 sec., ƒ/8 and ISO 1600

Page 1 of 2

33 Comments

ED LINDSEY makes this comment

Friday 12 March, 2010

I WAS NOT SURE OF BOOSTING THE ISO TO HIGH. I REMEMBER WHEN I USED TO USE TRI X FILM.I HAVE A NIKOND3 AND D200. I JUST BOUGHT A NIKKOR 800MM F8 LENSE A 1986 ERRA. I SENT TO A REPAIR COMPANY TO GET IT CLEANED AND ADJUSTED IF NEEDED. I AMA GUN DOG PHOTOGRAPHER AND NEED THE XTRA POWER. I ALMOST ALWAYS SHOOT AT LEAST 100 TO 200 YARDS. THANKS FOR THE ISO LESSON I NOW CAN FEEL GOOD ON USING THE ISO 1600 AND 3200 I NEEDED,,ED LINDSEY
Cornell makes this comment

Friday 12 March, 2010

I wish that Canon would concentrate on usability of prosumer-level DSLRs at very high ISOs, rather than on more megapixels.
Stratocaster makes this comment

Friday 12 March, 2010

With the upward march in usable ISO, why can't camera makers seem to get autofocus systems to work at any aperture smaller than f5.6?
Jay Dismas makes this comment

Saturday 13 March, 2010

Why is the moron with the poor writing and spelling skills being allowed to advertise handbags in this forum?
Sue Jarrett makes this comment

Sunday 14 March, 2010

Moron was too polite a name. Please remove those idiotic and unrelated comments.
Sue Jarrett makes this comment

Sunday 14 March, 2010

Now I can make a normal comment. This was a great article. I have been preaching for years that if you have to boost the ISO to get a shot you may never have the chance to get again -- do it! I love that the famous George Lepp is "agreeing" with me. Today's cameras CAN handle the higher ISOs and the images are very good quality. Maybe not perfect, but still good.
Daniel T DuLany makes this comment

Monday 15 March, 2010

Thankyou for the infomation on high ISOs. I have always been afraid to go to high because of grain or flat color, but now I have more trust and will try to use them when needed. I have a Nikon D90
John Schickler makes this comment

Monday 15 March, 2010

I agree with George Lepp. The new cameras are allowing us to capture images we only dreamed about a few years ago. I recently attended a presentation by Ken Conger on his summer as a ranger in Denali. He said he shot almost exclusively at ISO 400 and the shots were amazing. If you don't believe me, see for yourself at www.kencongerphotography.com Yes and please have a moderator check for the sales junk every once in a while. Thanks for the great article.
John Schickler makes this comment

Monday 15 March, 2010

On the autofocus issue, the systems require a certain amount of light to analyze the image and identify the object of the focus. Just as your eyes find it hard to focus in low light, so does your camera. One day soon, we will see improvement but it will be difficult.
John Schickler makes this comment

Monday 15 March, 2010

Thanks to George Lepp for keeping us up to date on the latest techniques and features available with the new DSLR's. It is true that cameras are letting us capture images we only dreamed of before. I recently attended a presentation by Ken Conger on his summer as a ranger at Denali and the amazing shots he took, almost exclusively at ISO 400. If you would like to see what 400 can do, go to kencongerphotography.com and see for yourself. It is inspiring.
Peter Horn makes this comment

Tuesday 23 March, 2010

Isn’t it weird to read how people need to be encouraged to just go and TRY high ISO settings on the camera they already own? - It won’t cost you one cent. Instead of reading theoretical articles on noise levels just go out and take pictures instead! In any case, high ISO noise is less annoying than blurry shots through camera shake. Every generation of DSLR gets better in terms of picture quality, especially noise. The amateur D90 outperforms the older semi-pro D200. Sensor size brings in an extra advantage. It’s because of pixel SIZE, not pixel COUNT, plus better in-camera processing if you shoot jpg.
James R. Kyle makes this comment

Sunday 11 April, 2010

One of the best "New Equipment" articles that I have read in a long time... Yeah! George Lepp and Dewitt Jones are two of my favorate writers for OP.
raincoat-supplier makes this comment

Monday 12 April, 2010

Very happy to share you article! Welcome to www.raincoat-supplier.com bringing you all the latest news, reviews,special offers and recommendations on Kids and women's Umbrellas. Browse our site for information and offers, with new ones added everyday.
replicahandbags makes this comment

Tuesday 13 April, 2010

gemahrv0414 Replica Handbags lOUIS VUITTON Handbags Designer Replica Handbags Gucci bags Louis Vuitton Handbags LOUIS VUITTON Replica Handbags PRADA Handbags HERMES Handbags HERMES Birkin Hermes Replica Handbags BURBERRY Handbags Replica WALLETS Louis Vuitton Wallets Hermes Wallets Gucci Wallets Hermes Belts Louis Vuitton Belts Gucci Belts Replica SCARF Louis Vuitton Scarf Hermes Scarf Burberry Scarf Gucci Scarves Louis Vuitton Bracelets Hermes Bracelets Prada Scarf Hermes Bracelet Hermes handbags Replica Handbags Replica Louis Vuitton
replica handbags makes this comment

Tuesday 13 April, 2010

gemahrv0414 Replica Handbags lOUIS VUITTON Handbags
Mark Stelmack makes this comment

Wednesday 21 April, 2010

All examples are from the Mark IV. Just curious as to how the 7D performed at the high ISO settings. Thanks
Ed Hardy makes this comment

Wednesday 12 May, 2010

In America many people have a romantic idea of life in the countryside.
air max 360 makes this comment

Tuesday 25 May, 2010

Thanks for you share the article.
metin2 yang makes this comment

Tuesday 25 May, 2010

metin2 yang
dj01 makes this comment

Tuesday 25 May, 2010

wow gold
wow gold makes this comment

Tuesday 25 May, 2010

wow gold
air max nike makes this comment

Wednesday 26 May, 2010

I agree with you.
mouth makes this comment

Sunday 30 May, 2010

louis vuitton handbags gucci handbags chanel bags
mouth makes this comment

Sunday 30 May, 2010

http://www.4bag4.com
ed hardy makes this comment

Wednesday 2 June, 2010

wonderfull camare ,i think this is the best choice ,i like it
mbt sandals makes this comment

Thursday 3 June, 2010

It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post.
mbt sandals makes this comment

Thursday 3 June, 2010

Thank you for your sharing.
宿舍 makes this comment

Tuesday 8 June, 2010

I’m very interested in your article,
Microsoft Office 2007 makes this comment

Tuesday 22 June, 2010

MS Office 2007 Professional MS Office 2007 Ultimate Office 2007 Pro Office Professional 2007 Office Ultimate 2007 Office 2007 key Office 2007 enterprise MS Office 2007 Quickbooks 2010 Quickbooks Pro 2010 Windows 7 Home Premium Windows 7 Professional
rosetta stone spanish makes this comment

Sunday 27 June, 2010

The article written by your very good, I like it very much. I will keep your new article.
air jordan 11 makes this comment

Monday 28 June, 2010

Well , the view of the passage is totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum!
full lace wig makes this comment

Tuesday 29 June, 2010

Great blog, and thanks for the insight.
Christian Louboutin Sandals makes this comment

Saturday 10 July, 2010

Thank you for your sharing. I like your article