Advertisement
Advertisement
Read Next

Photo Of The Day By eabowe
Today’s Photo of the Day is...
Photo Of The Day By Beth Baker
Today’s Photo of the Day is “Winter...
Stillness Assignment Winner Karthik Subramaniam
Congratulations to Karthik Subramaniam...
Photo Of The Day By Stephani Holdorf
Today’s Photo of the Day is “Snow...Advertisement
Featured Articles

Read More
Wide Angle Wildlife
Reach for your wide angle lens to capture more of your subject’s story.

Read More
How To Use Hyperfocal Focusing
Understand and use hyperfocal focusing to create sharper images and enhanced depth of field.

Read More
Columbia River Gorge Photo Locations
Waterfalls, wildflowers and stunning mountain backdrops await in the Pacific Northwest.

Read More
Depth Of Field In Macro Photography
In macro photography, depth of field is especially important to ensure the details of your subject are sharp. Use these 5 tips to get the best results.

Read More
Landscape Photography Lenses
Our guide to wide-angle lenses, the most popular and useful optics for landscape photography.

Read More
Lenses For Wildlife Photography
When it comes to selecting lenses for wildlife photography, the first thing most photographers look for is focal length—a long lens that can reach out and cover great distances, bringing animals in for close-ups—but other features are also incredibly useful.
Another Sad Story…
Discredited Lynx Photo by Terje Helleso
Can you see the cat at the bottom of this photo? It is purported to be a wild European Lynx, shot through forest vegetation that gives the image a sense of mystery – entirely appropriate for such a secretive, rarely-seen animal. The only trouble is that this picture – which won the “Swedish Wildlife Photographer of the Year” award for Terje Helleso – has been shown to be a fake, a composite of a landscape and a stock photo of a captive cat.
To learn more, go here.
This comes less than two years after a similar scandal rocked the prestigious BBC/Veolia Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition in the UK. (In that case, the winning photographer tried to pass off a captive and baited wolf as a wild one) Details here.
What is surprising is not that people continue to fake pictures like this, further eroding the value of genuine, hard-won wildlife photography. What I find surprising is that in both cases, the photographer did it in such high-profile, highly-scrutinized venues, and almost got away with it.
This is not just a comment on the challenge of recognizing fakes in this Universe of Photoshop, but that the pressure to rise above the competition, to out-shoot your peers, makes this kind of behavior almost inevitable.
In an article I wrote for the BBC a few years ago, I expressed the fear that we were in danger of losing the “Wow” factor in photography, the sense of delight and astonishment that comes from a genuinely remarkable picture. Whether it is the use of trained animals, dishonest composites, or the wild exaggeration and over-saturation becoming so commonplace in much current landscape photography, we are in real danger of squandering what makes photography worthwhile, it’s ability to inspire real, genuine wonder. I find that terribly sad.