Advertisement
Advertisement
Read Next

Photo Of The Day By Paul Laurenza
Today’s Photo of the Day is “Ghost...
Photo Of The Day By Gary Nack
Today’s Photo of the Day is “Into...
Photo Of The Day By Kathy Ritter
Today’s Photo of the Day is “Fog...
Photo Of The Day By eabowe
Today’s Photo of the Day is...Advertisement
Featured Articles

Read More
Adventure Sports Photography: Challenge Accepted
Tips and techniques for getting started in adventure sports photography.

Read More
Bonsai Rock
Photographing this iconic feature of Lake Tahoe.

Read More
Surf Photography: Catching The Wave
How to capture epic surf photography on land and in the water.

Read More
Lake Of The Clouds
Best times and locations to photograph in Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Michigan.

Read More
Point Reyes National Seashore
One of the best-kept secrets of the National Park Service, Point Reyes National Seashore is a year-round wildlife destination.

Read More
How To Photograph The Milky Way
Panoramas are one of the most fun and dramatic ways of capturing the Milky Way.
Get a Release? Get a Life…
< Photo Removed>
This is an issue of photography and simple fairness. A friend and colleague here in Seattle has been slapped with a $60,000 copyright infringement lawsuit by an artist who created a set of popular iconic “dance footsteps” on the public sidewalk in a local neighborhood. Mike Hipple, a part-time travel photographer and father of two, took a picture of someone “dancing” to the steps as a symbol of Seattle, and it eventually sold as a stock photograph – for the princely sum of $60.
When notified by the sculptor that the footsteps were copyrighted, Mike and the stock agency that held it immediately agreed to remove the photo and ultimately destroyed it. The agency paid some damages for the alleged infringement. Fair enough. But a year later the artist came after Mike.
Now, I am loathe to argue against an artist trying to protect his work – God knows I have been ripped off any number of times – but this suit seems vastly out-of-proportion to the offense. How many of us have pictures in our collection of public art : the Merrill Lynch bull on Wall Street, the “Bean” in Chicago, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in DC? Do we all have property releases for those images? I doubt it.
It would be one thing if Mike had tried to suggest that the footsteps were his own original work, or used them to sell commercial products. But this was a simple travel shot, showing a beloved piece of public art. But now Mike may have to sell his home to settle this suit. Go figure.
So, my advice? Be careful next time you trip the shutter, and get a property release for any public object if you plan to selling it as a print, in a magazine or to a friend. Sad.
For more information (and to see the offending picture), see Bob Krist’s wonderful travel blog.
To help Mike, consider a donation to his legal defense fund. This issue affects all of us.
I welcome comments on this complicated subject.