Advertisement
Advertisement
Read Next
Photo Of The Day By Ross Stone
Today’s Photo Of The Day is...Behind The Shot: Balance
“And into the forest I go to lose my...Photo Of The Day By Max Foster
Today’s Photo Of The Day is...Photos Of The Day For February 2021
Did you miss a Photo Of The Day last...Advertisement
Featured Articles
Read More
Camera Settings For Wildlife Photography
How to choose the right combination of exposure settings for the situation.
Read More
How To Use Hyperfocal Focusing
Understand and use hyperfocal focusing to create sharper images and enhanced depth of field.
To access this content, you must purchase Outdoor Photographer Membership.
Read More
How To Photograph The Milky Way
Panoramas are one of the most fun and dramatic ways of capturing the Milky Way.
Read More
Bonsai Rock
Photographing this iconic feature of Lake Tahoe.
To access this content, you must purchase Outdoor Photographer Membership.
Read More
No Low-Pass Filter on Photography Cameras?
In 2012, Nikon introduced the D800 and the D800E, which were identical, but the D800E had the effects of its anti-aliasing (AA) filter removed.
Read More
Point Reyes National Seashore
One of the best-kept secrets of the National Park Service, Point Reyes National Seashore is a year-round wildlife destination.
To access this content, you must purchase Outdoor Photographer Membership.
Pro Talk: Does Size Matter? Medium format digital vs. DSLRs
(© Ian Plant) I recently got a question from a reader: does it make sense for the aspiring landscape photographer to use a medium format camera system? Back in the old days of film, most serious landscape shooters used medium or large format cameras (the notable exceptions to this were nature generalists who shot a mix of wildlife, macro, and landscape subjects). In fact, medium format wasn’t really all that popular with landscape photographers—4×5 and 8×10 cameras were all the rage. I used a 4×5 field camera for years, along with a “backup” medium format camera for working in fast changing light, before making the switch to a 35mm format DSLR almost ten years ago.
(Note that for the sake of ease, I’m going to exclude medium format digital cameras from the commonly used “DSLR” moniker—although medium format cameras technically are DSLRs, when most people think of DSLRs they think of full frame 35mm sized cameras and smaller formats such as APS-C and the like.)
Scenes with a lot of detail could certainly benefit from the extra-large sensor size offered by medium format digital systems—but is the juice worth the squeeze? “Faerie Grove”—Olympic National Park, USA. Canon EOS 5D Mark III Digital Camera, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II, polarizer filter, ISO 100, f/11, 0.3 seconds.
These days, digital large format hasn’t really emerged as a viable option for nature photographers, but medium format manufacturers have been able to (marginally) stay in the game. If you have $30,000+ burning a hole in your pocket, then you can get a whopping 80 megapixels from the latest medium format cameras. Of course, that’s just for the camera, expect to pay several thousands (or even tens of thousands) more for a full complement of lenses, putting your total for a medium format system somewhere in the range of $50,000. So, if money isn’t an issue for you, why not shoot medium format? Here’s a list of the pros and cons of using a medium format digital system. Let’s start with the pros:
I love using my DSLR for night photography, such as with this moonlit scene above. Are medium format digital cameras up to the task? “Moon Storm”—Torres del Paine National Park, Chile. Canon EOS 5D Mark III Digital Camera, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II, ISO 400, f/5, 2 minutes.
Well, that’s about it for the pros. Here come the cons—you might want to get comfortable, this might take some time:
And, I almost forgot: your medium format system will likely cost you A LOT OF MONEY—we’re talking “holy crap!” levels of money! $50,000 can pay for a lot of trips to exotic shooting locations.
You can pretty much forget about shooting wildlife with a medium format system! “Hide and Seek”—Ding Darling National Wildlife Refuge, USA. Canon EOS 5D Mark III Digital Camera, Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS Lens, Canon 1.4x EF Extender III (Teleconverter), ISO 400, f/5.6, 1/400 second.
So, what’s the bottom line? Personally, even if I were offered a medium format digital system for free, I probably wouldn’t use it that much. Frankly, I’ve grown addicted to the speed and flexibility that a 35mm format digital system offers, and the quality is more than sufficient for the vast majority of my needs. And I’m not the only one who has come to this conclusion—I don’t personally know any pro nature photographer who uses medium format digital (I know there are a few medium format nature shooters out there, but I don’t personally know them). If you’re super rich, then by all means, splurge on a medium format digital system. But will it really allow you to make better photos? For all of the reasons I have outlined above, I really don’t think that it will. At this point in the evolution of digital camera technology, size really doesn’t matter as much as it used to.